*blinks* WOW.
Mar. 9th, 2007 12:36 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The Washington DC Circuit Court has struck down DC's 30-year-old ban on handguns, citing the 2nd Amendment as an individual right. More here.
I do believe that this is the first time this has happened.
As a self-admitted 2nd Amendment Fundamentalist and the wife of a Concealed Carry permit holder... yeah, I'm doing a little chair-dance right now.
I do believe that this is the first time this has happened.
As a self-admitted 2nd Amendment Fundamentalist and the wife of a Concealed Carry permit holder... yeah, I'm doing a little chair-dance right now.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 07:45 pm (UTC)I thought it'd be someone on the other side who posted first.
I'm a bit sick and sore, so I won't chairdance, but I get you.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 09:08 pm (UTC)Oh, wait...
I'm probably going to lose my liberal cred for this, but I'm actually happy to hear this. Gun control doesn't work in the real world.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-10 04:22 am (UTC)Will there be problems? Count on it. My personal experience is that any freedom — ANY freedom — will inevitably be abused by someone. If more people are allowed free access to handguns, there will almost automatically be more deaths caused by handguns. (The same could be said for automobiles, swimming pools, or electric toasters.) Some people are bad, and some people are stupid, and these people WILL cause problems if allowed the opportunity. Is this an argument against handgun ownership? Hell, no. Why should all those who are intelligent and responsible be penalized because of the defectives?
I agree with you that this is a rare and unexpected sign of sanity. I’m not sure it can be taken as a harbinger of more such good news. But we can hope.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-10 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-10 11:01 pm (UTC)"Judge Karen Henderson dissented, writing that the Second Amendment does not apply to the District of Columbia because it is not a state."
Methinks someone who thinks the Constitution doesn't apply to federal districts ought not be a judge...
Standard disclaimer: Icon refers to Idiot Judge, not you.
Date: 2007-03-11 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 07:46 pm (UTC)