agilebrit: (NOT a smile)
[personal profile] agilebrit
Yes, yes. I've ranted about this before. At length. Well. I'm going to rant about it again, because it's getting more and more ridiculous.

Standard Manuscript Format. We all love it. It's ugly, but functional. It lends uniformity to our deathless prose. One-inch margins, double-spacing, name, story title, page number in the header, half-inch indent for paragraphs (via tab or ruler), first page with the contact info and word count. There's a few things up for grabs (two spaces after a period or one? Underlines or italics? It doesn't matter because those things are easy to change), but this is the standard for a professionally-prepared manuscript.

Unless you are a special snowflake.

I came across a market today (which shall remain unnamed). In their guidelines, they want:
  • 1.5 spacing (not double spacing, no, that would be too easy)
  • .3 indent (no tabs, use the ruler)
  • no header
  • very definite that they only want one space after a period
  • Times New Roman (yes, I realize that TNR is becoming as accepted as Courier New, but bleargh)
  • ETA: OH AND... a summary of the story. Kill me now.


I am going to assume that they also want italics rather than underlining, because that seems to be how they're rolling. But they didn't say so, perhaps assuming that modern writers don't use such outdated things. *snort*

And I look at guidelines like that, and make a o.O face, and then... don't submit, nine times out of ten. Because I am tired of ticky-tack guidelines that turn me into an unpaid typesetter for these people. And oh my God, but it seems like the less they pay, the more ticky-tack the formatting they want is! This is a small-press royalty antho. There's no guarantee I'll be paid anything at all!

I am also tired of having eight different files of the same damn story on my hard drive. PICK A FORMAT. I realize that publishing is in flux right now and everyone thinks that Word is a shiny toy they can play with, but... why do they insist on making my life more difficult than it already is?

The nice thing about Word is that I can make the stupid changes, save the file, send it, and then undo them back to my Standard file, especially for guidelines as ridiculous as this. But the weirdo formatting demands are becoming such that I don't even want to submit to these places unless they're offering pro rates or better. If you're going to throw wads of money at my head, sure, I'll format the damned thing in Papyrus or Comic Sans or friggin' Wingdings for you. "A share of the proceeds"? Ha, no, not unless I know you and I'm doing you a favor.

Date: 2016-07-20 08:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] selenite.livejournal.com
I'd skip that one too. Though I will put up with the one site that says "Just paste it into the web form" because I didn't use italics in that story.

Date: 2016-07-20 08:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agilebrit.livejournal.com
Ugh, I hate those too. Even when they say "don't worry about formatting" I worry about it.

And if they want me to format it after acceptance, that's a different ballgame. In that case, there is definite money on the table. But for a maybe, perhaps, someday, if we break even on this thing--and we probably won't accept your story anyway? Yeaaaaah no.

And what they don't realize is that Hey, I'm not the only one out there with this attitude. I'm not so desperate to be published that I'll jump through ridiculous formatting requirements for a promise of a pittance... and neither will most writers who are at a particular level. "We want your best!" Well, yes, so does everyone else. And if you're not going to make it easy and desirable for me to give you my "best", you're getting my dregs--if I sub at all.

Date: 2016-07-23 03:00 pm (UTC)
clhollandwriter: (marchin)
From: [personal profile] clhollandwriter
Yeah, I don't submit to these markets either, unless they're paying extremely well.

Date: 2016-07-24 08:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] werewolf-hacker.livejournal.com
I wonder if they realize that they're actually shrinking their pool of submitters by doing this.

Date: 2016-07-30 07:29 pm (UTC)
clhollandwriter: (marchin)
From: [personal profile] clhollandwriter
They probably do, but not in the way they intend. They think they're weeding out people who don't read the guidelines properly, but they're actually weeding out professionals who don't have the time or inclination to pratt around.

Date: 2016-07-30 11:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] werewolf-hacker.livejournal.com
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeep.

October 2020

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
1112131415 16 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 9th, 2026 09:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios