agilebrit: (Default)
agilebrit ([personal profile] agilebrit) wrote2007-12-05 04:05 pm
Entry tags:

*ponders like a pondery thing*

So, the issue of Renard's Menagerie with my story in it is live and people can order it. And now I have to wonder about my anonymity on the internet and whether it serves any good purpose. I still itch a little about letting total strangers see my real name...on the other hand, it's good that people know their authors, right? And the blurb about me in the issue points right here.

On the third hand (I am a science fiction writer, after all), people can be big fat stalkers over the internet, which makes it easy. And that scares me, just a little. Okay, a little digging will turn up my real name, if someone wanted to take the trouble, but should I make it easier, or harder?

Also, editors read blogs, and while I've never shied away (very much) from being what some would consider controversial, I have to wonder what an editor who stumbles across this thing--or actually comes looking for it--would think. Of course, I also have to think that if an editor is going to turn me down because of my political views rather than because my writing is crap, I'd rather not be published by them anyway. It's not like writers of a more liberal bent have to watch what they say because it'll hurt them professionally, after all. But this is the real world we live in, isn't it? *sigh*

[identity profile] redeem147.livejournal.com 2007-12-05 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not like writers of a more liberal bent have to watch what they say, after all.

In the current American climate? I'm not sure that I'd agree with you.

[identity profile] agilebrit.livejournal.com 2007-12-05 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
My impression is that editors and writers are of a more liberal mindset than I am. Which, heh, wouldn't be all that hard. I was talking about professionally rather than "OMG the NSA is coming to knock on my door hide the guns."

And I haven't noticed much difference between the current American climate and the one we had under Clinton, honestly, in what you "can or can't say." The major difference is that if the Dems try to reinstate the UnFairness Doctrine now (which they're trying to do), President Bush would (probably) veto it, whereas Clinton (either of them) would (probably) sign it.

And with Silly Season rapidly descending upon us, I'm betting I'm going to be locking more posts. Just because.

[identity profile] agilebrit.livejournal.com 2007-12-05 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
*edits post to make more clear*